I work mostly with plants and insects, and my projects are united by a focus on how land-use and land-cover change influence biodiversity and ecosystem function. Most of my research is field- and lab/greenhouse-based, but I also incorporate modeling (GIS, model fitting, simulations) and analytical (stable isotope and DNA sequencing) approaches into my research. My research links empirically-derived data with ecological theory and I use this basic knowledge to better manage insects and plants for conservation and sustainable agriculture. Below is some information about my current projects.
1. Plant-insect interactions across spatial scales
Environmental variability can affect the strength of plant-insect interactions yet it is unclear how these patterns should change with spatial scale. I have worked on several NSF, USDA, and DOE funded projects examining how environmental variability influences plant-insect interactions at different spatial scales. At very small spatial scales (< 2 m2), I found that environmental variability due to plant neighborhood composition influenced damage to plants (Kim and Underwood 2015). The mechanisms by which neighborhood composition influences damage was through variability in herbivore growth, host-plant selection, and feeding behavior (Kim 2017). At medium spatial scales (i.e., landscape scale), I also found that environmental variability due landscape composition influenced the strength of tri-trophic interactions between plants, insect herbivores, and arthropod predators (Liere, Kim, et al. 2014, Kim et al. 2017, Kim et al. 2018) by affecting the regional species pool of arthropods and prey-tracking ability of predators for prey. Finally, at very large spatial scales (i.e., continent scale), I found that environmental variability due to location along a latitudinal gradient influenced plant damage and resistance which were likely driven by differences in herbivore community structure, range, and distribution (Kim, 2014). Altogether these studies suggest that environmental factors affecting insect feeding behavior and their distribution can influence the strength of plant-insect interactions across multiple scales. Understanding how the strength of plant-insect interactions varies across spatial gradients has implications for predicting how disturbances such as land-use change or climate change might impact plant communities through their effects on insect herbivores (Kim et al. 2013).
2. Disturbance effects on biodiversity
Natural and anthropogenic disturbances can influence biodiversity and ecosystem function. Because disturbances can occur at both localized and landscape scales, it is unclear whether these disturbances can have additive or multiplicative effects for plant and insect communities. In partnership with USFWS, DNR, and MSU, I examined how annual harvesting of perennial grasslands (a localized disturbance) affected predatory arthropod communities and the ecological functions they perform (natural biological control). I also examined whether land-use change (a landscape-scale disturbance) could accentuate or mitigate the potentially negative effects of disturbance for arthropod communities. I found that annual harvesting of perennial grasslands and land-use change had variable effects on the abundances of different functional groups (Kim et al. 2017), alpha and beta diversity (Kim et al. 2018), and predator diet breadth (Kim et al. in review). Despite these changes in predator community structure and feeding behavior, there were no harvest effects on pest suppression services suggesting compensation in pest suppression function by unaffected arthropod groups. These results suggest that disturbances occurring at different spatial scales (localized versus landscape scales) can interact with one another to have unpredictable, non-additive effects on arthropod biodiversity and ecosystem function.
3. Spatio-temporal effects of resource availability on insect population dynamics
I am investigating the relative importance of spatial and temporal heterogeneity in resource availability on population dynamics of consumers. Landscape theory has focused mainly on how the spatial arrangement of patches (i.e., amount and configuration) affect population dynamics of consumers but the importance of temporal variability in resource availability has been largely overlooked. Furthermore, landscape-level field studies are often correlative due to the inherent difficulties of manipulating entire landscapes, therefore factors such as resource amount and arrangement are often confounded. Using a lab microcosm setup with bean beetles (Callosobruchus maculatus), I am testing how the spatial arrangement and timing of available resources affect populations dynamics of consumers. Bean beetles are ideal organisms to test theories in landscape ecology because they are easy to rear in the lab, landscape configurations are easy to manipulate, and generation times are relatively short (30 days from egg to adult). This lab approach will allow me to disentangle the relative importance of food resource timing and spatial arrangement on consumer populations.